Jacobs v. Ehehalt

149 A. 758, 8 N.J. Misc. 266, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 250
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 9, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 149 A. 758 (Jacobs v. Ehehalt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. Ehehalt, 149 A. 758, 8 N.J. Misc. 266, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 250 (N.J. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict for $5,000 and the defendant has a rule for new trial, contending that the damages are excessive.

Plaintiff had a broken fibula of the left leg; had it in a cast for six weeks; stiffness followed and there is some impairment of motion. He is a farmer seventy years old, does much of his own work and may have trouble in performing the heavier duties incident thereto. He had a medical bill of $249.

We think, however, that the verdict is excessive. If the plaintiff will accept the sum of $3,500 the rule will be discharged; otherwise it will be made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A. 758, 8 N.J. Misc. 266, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-ehehalt-nj-1930.