Jacobs v. Eclipse Paint & Mfg. Co.
This text of 1923 OK 929 (Jacobs v. Eclipse Paint & Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The plaintiff in error has failed to file briefs as required by the rule of this court, and this cause is subject to dismissal.
The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss which is well taken. On April 24, 1923, it was duly ordered that plaintiff in error file brief on or before July 1, 1923. On July 9, 1923, upon stipulation of the parties, an order was entered extending the time to August 1, 1923, within which the plaintiff in error should file brief.
Plaintiff in error has wholly failed to file any briefs or make any showing, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.
Plaintiff in error has filed a proper motion for judgment on the super sedeas bond which appears in the case-made. This motion is also well taken.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed, and judgment -rendered against the surety on, the supersedeas bond, W. J. Mason, in the sum of $340.63, with interest from December 8, 1919.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1923 OK 929, 219 P. 705, 93 Okla. 187, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-eclipse-paint-mfg-co-okla-1923.