Jacobs v. Commercial Bank of Gainesville

221 So. 2d 439, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5949
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 1969·No. No. K-438·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having- been orally argued and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Harrison v. Consumers Mortgage Company, 154 So.2d 194 (Fla.App.1963); Tomayko v. Thomas, 144 So.2d 335 (Fla.App.1962); Jones v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., 109 So.2d 582 (Fla.App.1959); Johnson v. Studstill, 71 So.2d 251 (Fla.1954); Moore’s Federal Practice 2nd Ed. Vol. 6, Sec. 56.15 [1-0] pp. 2284.

WIGGINTON, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., J., and MANN, ROBERT S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacobs v. Commercial Bank of Gainesville, 221 So. 2d 439, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5949 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

221 So. 2d 439 (Jacobs v. Commercial Bank of Gainesville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrison v. Consumers Mortgage Company
154 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Johnson v. Studstill
71 So. 2d 251 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Jones v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
109 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Tomayko v. Thomas
144 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)