Jacobs v. Bureau of Prisons

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jacobs v. Bureau of Prisons. Read the opinion of the Court — 845 F. Supp. 2d 224
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 29, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-0274·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NATHAN E. JACOBS

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 1l-274 (RJL) BUREAU OF PRlSONS, et al.,

Defendants.

££\J%/\/\J\_/§/§/\./\./\_/

ORDER February?’g , 2012

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in Part, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment in Part [Dkt. #20] and that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff’ s "Bivens" Claims [Dkt. #26] are GRANTED;

and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Amicus Curiae [Dkt. #28] and

Motions for Leave to File [Dkt. #36, 38-40] are DENIED.

This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a).

\ l RICHARD JLLBJ>?

United States District Judge

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacobs v. Bureau of Prisons, (D.D.C. 2012).

Jacobs v. Bureau of Prisons (Jacobs v. Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.