Jacobs v. Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NATHAN E. JACOBS
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 1l-274 (RJL) BUREAU OF PRlSONS, et al.,
Defendants.
££\J%/\/\J\_/§/§/\./\./\_/
ORDER February?’g , 2012
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in Part, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment in Part [Dkt. #20] and that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff’ s "Bivens" Claims [Dkt. #26] are GRANTED;
and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Amicus Curiae [Dkt. #28] and
Motions for Leave to File [Dkt. #36, 38-40] are DENIED.
This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a).
\ l RICHARD JLLBJ>?
United States District Judge
SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacobs v. Bureau of Prisons (Jacobs v. Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.