Jacobs v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N

698 N.W.2d 392, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 940, 2005 WL 1535833
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 28, 2005
Docket127272
StatusPublished

This text of 698 N.W.2d 392 (Jacobs v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N, 698 N.W.2d 392, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 940, 2005 WL 1535833 (Mich. 2005).

Opinion

698 N.W.2d 392 (2005)
472 Mich. 899-924

JACOBS
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N.

No. 127272.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 28, 2005.

SC: 127272.

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered. Relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 N.W.2d 392, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 940, 2005 WL 1535833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-attorney-grievance-comn-mich-2005.