Jacobs v. Ashe

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJanuary 22, 2002
DocketI.C. NOS. 938802 PH-0311
StatusPublished

This text of Jacobs v. Ashe (Jacobs v. Ashe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. Ashe, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

***********
Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission adopts with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

***********
Based upon all the competent evidence adduced at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of his injury on 13 April 1999, plaintiff was an employee of John D. Ashe d/b/a Dave's Tree Service. Defendant-employer Dave's Tree Service is a business wholly owned and operated by defendant John David Ashe of Midland, North Carolina. Defendant-employer allegedly had prior workers' compensation insurance through Nationwide Insurance Company. Because of financial problems, defendant Ashe dropped the workers' compensation insurance. Defendant-employer advertised in the yellow pages as being fully licensed and insured.

2. John David Ashe did not appear at the 7 February 2000 hearing before the Deputy Commissioner on plaintiff's workers' compensation claim, despite having proper written and oral notice of the date, time and location of the hearing.

3. Plaintiff was hired by defendant Ashe to work as a foreman of a tree crew for defendant-employer approximately six months prior to the time of his injury.

4. At the time defendant Ashe hired plaintiff, defendant Ashe indicated he would withhold taxes in his check. However, defendant Ashe did not withhold taxes. Each time a check was delivered to plaintiff, defendant Ashe indicated that withholding taxes would be taken out at the next paycheck. Plaintiff was paid by the hour rather than by the job on a contractual basis.

5. At the time plaintiff was hired by defendant-employer, plaintiff was given rules and regulations which stated that each employee was to meet certain expectations relating to the employment for defendant-employer. These rules and regulations referred explicitly to employees. According to the rules and regulations, employees were required to take a 30 minute break for lunch every day, unexcused absences were penalized by a cut in pay, and employees were not to leave the job site without talking to defendant Ashe. Use and maintenance of tools supplied by defendant-employer and specific duties for truck drivers were outlined, and employees were instructed that whenever an individual walked onto a job seeking an estimate, they were to give the individual a card for defendant-employer and not quote prices. Employees were further instructed that using any of the equipment provided by defendant Ashe for his tree service on other jobs would result in their dismissal from employment.

6. Plaintiff supervised a crew of three other men who were employed by defendant Ashe. Defendant Ashe obtained the jobs for his crew, sent the crew to the job site, and instructed the crew as to what they were to do on that job site.

7. Calvin Bell contracted with defendant Ashe to remove trees at his home. On 13 April 1999, plaintiff was using a chainsaw to cut a log at the home of Calvin Bell. The chainsaw kicked back and the blade went between his first and second fingers of his left hand lacerating both fingers and causing nerve damage to his index finger. Plaintiff was taken to Carolinas Medical Center.

8. On 7 July 1999, plaintiff had surgery in which a nerve was transplanted from his left foot into his injured finger. As a result of the nerve transplant, plaintiff retains a permanent numbness in his left foot. The nerve transplant was not successful in restoring the feeling in the index finger of plaintiff's left hand. Plaintiff retains a lack of feeling, soreness and other problems in both the index finger of his left hand and his left foot.

9. Plaintiff spoke with defendant Ashe by telephone from the hospital on the day of the accident and informed defendant Ashe of his injury. Defendant Ashe assured plaintiff that he had workers' compensation insurance and asked to speak to plaintiff's physician. Plaintiff had no further communication with defendant Ashe prior to the time of the penalty hearing before the Deputy Commissioner on 13 March 2000.

10. There is insufficient evidence to support defendant's affirmative defense of intoxication. Plaintiff denied using any intoxicating substance before or while working on 13 April 1999 and he denied being asked by defendant-employer to take a drug test. Plaintiff's testimony is accepted as credible. There is no competent evidence to refute plaintiff's denials and no evidence that his injury was proximately caused by the use of an intoxicant.

11. Defendant-employer has refused to pay for plaintiff's medical treatment provided by Carolinas Medical Center relating to the injury by accident on 13 April 1999, and plaintiff is currently being held responsible for those bills.

12. Plaintiff was out of work from 13 April 1999 until 20 August 1999, at which time he returned to work for Asplundh Tree Experts earning $2.50 less per hour ($100.00 less per week) than his pre-injury wages.

13. Plaintiff was an employee of defendant-employer and not an independent contractor.

14. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $600.00 per week yielding a compensation rate of $400.02.

15. This case is within the jurisdiction of the North Carolina Industrial Commission.

16. Plaintiff sustained an injury by accident on 13 April 1999.

17. Defendant Ashe regularly employed three or more employees beginning in 1993 and continuing at the time of plaintiff's injury by accident on 13 April 1999, but failed to have the necessary workers' compensation insurance in effect at that time. Defendant Ashe testified that has had no workers' compensation insurance from 1 January 1993 to the present with the exception of a period of one year "four or five years" before the date of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner.

18. Defendant Ashe has obtained workers' compensation insurance through the McNair/Baughman Insurance Services.

***********
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Full Commission enters the following:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. This case is within the jurisdiction of the North Carolina Industrial Commission. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2.

2. In order to claim workers' compensation benefits, the claimant "must be, in fact and in law, an employee of the party from whom compensation is claimed." Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck Sales,321 N.C. 380, 383, 364 S.E.2d 433, 437 (1988).

3. An independent contractor is one who contracts to perform a task pursuant to an independent employment and according to his own judgment and method. Hayes v. Elon College, 224 N.C. 11, 29 S.E.2d 137 (1944). Conversely, an employer-employee relationship exists when the employer retains control over the manner in which the details of the work are executed as opposed to merely requiring certain definite results under the contract. Id.

4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck Sales
364 S.E.2d 433 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1988)
Hayes v. . Elon College
29 S.E.2d 137 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jacobs v. Ashe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-ashe-ncworkcompcom-2002.