Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Jacobs' Pharmacy Co. v. Paschal

Jacobs' Pharmacy Co. v. Paschal

89 S.E. 213, 145 Ga. 346, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 313
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 213 (Jacobs' Pharmacy Co. v. Paschal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs' Pharmacy Co. v. Paschal, 89 S.E. 213, 145 Ga. 346, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 313 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

We have carefully considered all of the grounds of the motion for new trial. It appears that there was no error in the charge of the court. Certain omissions to charge, without request, matters which if given would have been merely elaborative of the charge as delivered, furnish no 'ground for the grant of a new trial. Though the verdict was large, it can not be held as a matter of law to be excessive.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Action for damages. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. December 31, 1914. G. T. & L. O. Hophins, and Rosser, Brandon, Slaton & Phillips, for plaintiff in error. Colquitt & Conyers, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rothberg v. Charles H. Hardin Construction Co.
140 S.E.2d 520 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Lowe v. Athens Marble & Granite Co.
122 S.E.2d 483 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 213, 145 Ga. 346, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-pharmacy-co-v-paschal-ga-1916.