Jacobs Instrument Co. v. Comptroller of the Treasury

140 A.2d 285, 216 Md. 290
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 1, 1991
Docket[No. 91, September Term, 1957.]
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 140 A.2d 285 (Jacobs Instrument Co. v. Comptroller of the Treasury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs Instrument Co. v. Comptroller of the Treasury, 140 A.2d 285, 216 Md. 290 (Md. 1991).

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, the appellant to pay the costs. Maryland Rule 835 b 5, provides that an appeal may be dismissed when the contents of the record extract do not comply with Rule 828 b. The latter rule requires that the record extract must contain “such parts of the record as may reasonably be necessary for the determination of the questions presented by the appeal,” including so much of the evidence, pleadings and other parts of the record as is material to the questions to be determined when a determination thereof depends upon the sufficiency of the evidence, pleadings or other matter to sustain the order of the lower court. The appellant made no effort to comply with Rule 828 c, despite efforts on the part of the appellee to reach an agreement as to the contents of the printed extract, and printed only (i) the opinion of the lower court, (ii) two paragraphs of the petition to appeal to the lower court from the finding of the Comptroller, and (iii) a one sentence paragraph from the transcript consisting of the sixth article of the contract between the Department of the Navy and the appellant. The record extract is patently insufficient for a determination of the numerous questions raised by the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salem Construction Corp. v. Tompkins
269 A.2d 824 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1970)
Arundel Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Morrison-Johnson, Inc.
259 A.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1969)
Prime Contractors, Inc. v. M. & C. C. of Baltimore
215 A.2d 214 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)
United States v. Jacobs
298 F.2d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 1961)
United States v. Jacobs
187 F. Supp. 630 (D. Maryland, 1959)
Bornstein v. State Tax Commission
151 A.2d 161 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.2d 285, 216 Md. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-instrument-co-v-comptroller-of-the-treasury-md-1991.