JACOBS-CARDENAS-JOHNSON v. City of Washington

District of Columbia

JACOBS-CARDENAS-JOHNSON v. City of Washington

587 F. Supp. 2d 113, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94033, 2008 WL 4921276

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 14, 2008

DocketCivil Action 08 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 587 F. Supp. 2d 113 (JACOBS-CARDENAS-JOHNSON v. City of Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JACOBS-CARDENAS-JOHNSON v. City of Washington, 587 F. Supp. 2d 113, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94033, 2008 WL 4921276 (D.D.C. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis, but will dismiss the complaint as frivolous and delusional.

*114 Plaintiffs complaint states in part that she is seeking to have “my Mom’s Prosecutor appt. of the Pentagon because she is deceased.” (Compl. at 2.) 1 It further states that “an Egyptian Doctor that was here ... was indeed attempting to force me to become his own Blood and Brain research.” (Id.) And, “[i]t is my DNA that the Egyptian Doctor wants and has harmed me several times throughout my life because of. My DNA and future Embryo’s are to become the United States Aerospace-Aeronautics future Astronauts of the United States of America.” (Id. at 3.) The complaint alleges no wrong-doing by any of the named defendants, but rather requests that the City of Washington to keep her safe. She also requests the Court to “produce and schedule for [her], by Law” an appointment for the U.S. Military Pentagon Court. (Id. at 5.)

This complaint presents precisely the sort of “fantastic or delusional scenarios” that warrant dismissal. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). Accordingly, this complaint will be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (requiring dismissal of frivolous complaints).

A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

1

. The pages of the complaint are unnumbered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis, but will dismiss the complaint as frivolous and delusional.

*114 Plaintiffs complaint states in part that she is seeking to have “my Mom’s Prosecutor appt. of the Pentagon because she is deceased.” (Compl. at 2.) 1 It further states that “an Egyptian Doctor that was here ... was indeed attempting to force me to become his own Blood and Brain research.” (Id.) And, “[i]t is my DNA that the Egyptian Doctor wants and has harmed me several times throughout my life because of. My DNA and future Embryo’s are to become the United States Aerospace-Aeronautics future Astronauts of the United States of America.” (Id. at 3.) The complaint alleges no wrong-doing by any of the named defendants, but rather requests that the City of Washington to keep her safe. She also requests the Court to “produce and schedule for [her], by Law” an appointment for the U.S. Military Pentagon Court. (Id. at 5.)

This complaint presents precisely the sort of “fantastic or delusional scenarios” that warrant dismissal. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). Accordingly, this complaint will be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (requiring dismissal of frivolous complaints).

A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

1

. The pages of the complaint are unnumbered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

587 F. Supp. 2d 113, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94033, 2008 WL 4921276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-cardenas-johnson-v-city-of-washington-dcd-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack