Jacobelli v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacobelli v. Regan

114 A.D.2d 609, 494 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53302

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 114 A.D.2d 609 (Jacobelli v. Regan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacobelli v. Regan, 114 A.D.2d 609, 494 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Harvey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for the ordinary death benefits of Vincent Jacobelli, a member of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System.

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties herein, the matter is remitted to respondent for further investigation as to the identity and existence of Juanita Jacobelli. In regard thereto, respondent should make an intensive investigation into the existence and whereabouts of Juanita Newman Goldman and make a determination as to whether she is the person referred to by decedent as Juanita Jacobelli, his wife.

Decision withheld, and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harvey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for the ordinary death benefits of Vincent Jacobelli, a member of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System.

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties herein, the matter is remitted to respondent for further investigation as to the identity and existence of Juanita Jacobelli. In regard thereto, respondent should make an intensive investigation into the existence and whereabouts of Juanita Newman Goldman and make a determination as to whether she is the person referred to by decedent as Juanita Jacobelli, his wife.

Decision withheld, and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 609, 494 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobelli-v-regan-nyappdiv-1985.