Jacobelli v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacobelli v. Regan

114 A.D.2d 609, 494 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53302

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jacobelli v. Regan. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 A.D.2d 166 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 17, 1985·Published

Opinion

Harvey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for the ordinary death benefits of Vincent Jacobelli, a member of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System.

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties herein, the matter is remitted to respondent for further investigation as to the identity and existence of Juanita Jacobelli. In regard thereto, respondent should make an intensive investigation into the existence and whereabouts of Juanita Newman Goldman and make a determination as to whether she is the person referred to by decedent as Juanita Jacobelli, his wife.

Decision withheld, and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harvey, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for the ordinary death benefits of Vincent Jacobelli, a member of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System.

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties herein, the matter is remitted to respondent for further investigation as to the identity and existence of Juanita Jacobelli. In regard thereto, respondent should make an intensive investigation into the existence and whereabouts of Juanita Newman Goldman and make a determination as to whether she is the person referred to by decedent as Juanita Jacobelli, his wife.

Decision withheld, and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Jacobelli v. Regan, 114 A.D.2d 609, 494 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

114 A.D.2d 609 (Jacobelli v. Regan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.