Jacobberger v. School District No. 1

235 P. 277, 114 Or. 575
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedApril 21, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 235 P. 277 (Jacobberger v. School District No. 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobberger v. School District No. 1, 235 P. 277, 114 Or. 575 (Or. 1925).

Opinion

McBRIDE, C. J.

The demurrer in this case should have been sustained. There is no allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff’s claim herein was ever presented to the school board for audit, and such presentation has been distinctly held to be necessary: Barrow v. School Dist. No. 8, 83 Or. 272 (162 Pac. 789). The complaint is fatally defective in this respect.

It is urged that this is cured by evidence introduced by the plaintiff tending to show that such presentation had been made, and it is urged that, this evidence having been introduced, the alleged omission is cured by the verdict. The introduction of such testimony was strenuously objected to by the defendant, and the lack of a necessary allegation in the complaint cannot be cured by a verdict based upon evidence improperly admitted.

The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded to the court below, with instructions to sustain the demurrer.

Reversed and Remanded With Directions.

Rehearing Denied.

Burnett, Rand and Coshow, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. School District No. 12
312 P.2d 591 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1957)
Boyle v. School District No. 8
222 P.2d 1004 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 P. 277, 114 Or. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobberger-v-school-district-no-1-or-1925.