Jacob Youngs, Incorporated v. . Kent
This text of 130 N.E. 933 (Jacob Youngs, Incorporated v. . Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court did not overlook the specification which provides that defective work shall be replaced. The promise to replace, • like the promise to *657 install, is to be viewed, not as a condition, but as independent and collateral, when the defect is trivial and innocent. The law does not nullify the covenant, but restricts the remedy to damages.
The motion for a re-argument should be denied.
His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 N.E. 933, 230 N.Y. 656, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacob-youngs-incorporated-v-kent-ny-1921.