Jacob v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacob v. Thompson

80 N.Y.S. 1028

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 80 N.Y.S. 1028 (Jacob v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacob v. Thompson, 80 N.Y.S. 1028 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that the plaintiff’s motion to place the cause on the Special Term calendar should have been denied upon the ground of loches. The action was noticed by both parties for Trial Term, and it has there been once tried, and now, after two years of delay, the effort is made to have it taken from the Trial Term calendar and sent to the Special Term. Upon the authority of the following cases, we think that the plaintiff, by loches, has waived his right to have the issues raised by the answer sent to the Special Term: Tubbs v. Embree, 89 Hun, 475, 35 N. Y. Supp. 320; Mackellar v. Rogers, 109 N. Y. 468, 17 N. E. 350; Boyd v. Boyd, 12 Misc. Rep. 119, 33 N. Y. Supp. 74, affirmed 146 N. Y. 403, 42 N. E. 542.

The order must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We think that the plaintiff’s motion to place the cause on the Special Term calendar should have been denied upon the ground of loches. The action was noticed by both parties for Trial Term, and it has there been once tried, and now, after two years of delay, the effort is made to have it taken from the Trial Term calendar and sent to the Special Term. Upon the authority of the following cases, we think that the plaintiff, by loches, has waived his right to have the issues raised by the answer sent to the Special Term: Tubbs v. Embree, 89 Hun, 475, 35 N. Y. Supp. 320; Mackellar v. Rogers, 109 N. Y. 468, 17 N. E. 350; Boyd v. Boyd, 12 Misc. Rep. 119, 33 N. Y. Supp. 74, affirmed 146 N. Y. 403, 42 N. E. 542.

The order must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 N.Y.S. 1028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacob-v-thompson-nyappdiv-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack