Jacob v. Dometic Origo AB
925 A.2d 1103, 282 Conn. 922, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 251
This text of 925 A.2d 1103 (Jacob v. Dometic Origo AB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jacob v. Dometic Origo AB, 925 A.2d 1103, 282 Conn. 922, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 251 (Colo. 2007).
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 100 Conn. App. 107 (AC 26784), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court: (1) abused its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint; and (2) improperly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jacob v. Dometic Origo AB
916 A.2d 872 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
925 A.2d 1103, 282 Conn. 922, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacob-v-dometic-origo-ab-conn-2007.