Jacob v. DAVIES, INC.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Jacob v. DAVIES, INC.

761 N.W.2d 486, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 36, 2009 WL 539923

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 25, 2009·No. A08-2047·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 31, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” *487 doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is not allowed attorney fees. BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 31, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” *487 doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is not allowed attorney fees. BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Jacob v. DAVIES, INC., 761 N.W.2d 486, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 36, 2009 WL 539923 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

761 N.W.2d 486 (Jacob v. DAVIES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related