Jacob Morales v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 24, 2011
Docket13-10-00403-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jacob Morales v. State (Jacob Morales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacob Morales v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00403-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

JACOB MORALES, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jacob Morales, was convicted of possession with intent to deliver

cocaine. On July 29, 2010, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. Appellant’s

appointed counsel in the trial court advised this Court that he was not retained or

appointed to represent appellant on appeal. On February 10, 2011, this Court abated

the appeal and ordered the trial court to determine whether appellant desired to

prosecute this appeal and whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

At the trial court hearing, appellant stated that he did not wish to continue with his

appeal and wanted to withdraw his appeal. Appellant’s trial court counsel has filed

motion to dismiss the appeal that does not contain the appellant’s signature. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.2 (a). Although no written motion has been filed in compliance with Rule

42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we conclude that good cause exists to

suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case in accordance with Rule 2. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 2. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is

DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 24th day of March, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jacob Morales v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacob-morales-v-state-texapp-2011.