Jacob Martin Stone Moriarty v. Claudia Leticia Alvarado Torres
Opinion
Opinion issued October 31, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
dismiss. In the motion, the parties represented that “mediation was a success” and
they had “finalized their settlement agreement.” They requested that the Court
dismiss the appeal and that costs be “tax[ed] . . . against the party who incurred the
same.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (d). The motion to dismiss is signed by
counsel for both parties.
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (c).
Accordingly, the Court reinstates the appeal on the Court’s active docket,
grants the parties’ motion, and dismisses the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2),
43.2(f). We direct the Clerk of this Court that costs are to be taxed against the party
incurring the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). We dismiss all other pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacob Martin Stone Moriarty v. Claudia Leticia Alvarado Torres (Jacob Martin Stone Moriarty v. Claudia Leticia Alvarado Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.