Jacob Martin Stone Moriarty v. Claudia Leticia Alvarado Torres

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 31, 2024
Docket01-24-00275-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jacob Martin Stone Moriarty v. Claudia Leticia Alvarado Torres (Jacob Martin Stone Moriarty v. Claudia Leticia Alvarado Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacob Martin Stone Moriarty v. Claudia Leticia Alvarado Torres, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Opinion issued October 31, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00275-CV ——————————— JACOB MARTIN STONE MORIARTY, Appellant V. CLAUDIA LETICIA ALVARADO TORRES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2018-83413

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 4, 2024, appellant, Jacob Martin Stone Moriarty, filed a notice of

appeal from the trial court’s January 8, 2024 final judgment. On May 16, 2024, the

Court abated this appeal and referred the parties to mediation. On October 3, 2024,

appellant and appellee, Claudia Leticia Alvarado Torres, filed a joint motion to dismiss. In the motion, the parties represented that “mediation was a success” and

they had “finalized their settlement agreement.” They requested that the Court

dismiss the appeal and that costs be “tax[ed] . . . against the party who incurred the

same.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (d). The motion to dismiss is signed by

counsel for both parties.

No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), (c).

Accordingly, the Court reinstates the appeal on the Court’s active docket,

grants the parties’ motion, and dismisses the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2),

43.2(f). We direct the Clerk of this Court that costs are to be taxed against the party

incurring the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). We dismiss all other pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jacob Martin Stone Moriarty v. Claudia Leticia Alvarado Torres, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacob-martin-stone-moriarty-v-claudia-leticia-alvarado-torres-texapp-2024.