Jacob Holm, Inc. v. Hermon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jacob Holm, Inc. v. Hermon

224 A.D.2d 200, 638 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 966

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 200 (Jacob Holm, Inc. v. Hermon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jacob Holm, Inc. v. Hermon, 224 A.D.2d 200, 638 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered June 9,1995, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Seneca Insurance Company’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint as against it pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Construing the lease as a whole (see, J.P. Realty Trust v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 102 AD2d 68, 71, affd 64 NY2d 945), it cannot be said as a matter of law that the leased premises did not include the alleged location of the accident at issue in the underlying tort action (cf., General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp. v Travelers Ins. Co., 162 AD2d 130, 131). The lease therefore does not "definitively dispose of the claim” (Demas v 325 W. End Ave. Corp., 127 AD2d 476, 477).

We have considered defendant-appellant’s remaining argument, and find it to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered June 9,1995, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Seneca Insurance Company’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint as against it pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Construing the lease as a whole (see, J.P. Realty Trust v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 102 AD2d 68, 71, affd 64 NY2d 945), it cannot be said as a matter of law that the leased premises did not include the alleged location of the accident at issue in the underlying tort action (cf., General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp. v Travelers Ins. Co., 162 AD2d 130, 131). The lease therefore does not "definitively dispose of the claim” (Demas v 325 W. End Ave. Corp., 127 AD2d 476, 477).

We have considered defendant-appellant’s remaining argument, and find it to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 200, 638 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacob-holm-inc-v-hermon-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack