Jacob Dold Packing Co. v. Kings County Refrigerating Co.

177 A.D. 896
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jacob Dold Packing Co. v. Kings County Refrigerating Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 A.D. 407

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. The order of affirmance is, however, modified to provide that same is without prejudice to defendant’s application to the Special Term to amend the terms of the reference so that the referee may pass on and report any damages which defendant may show it has sustained after its letter to plaintiff of August 27, 1915, through any loss or escape of refrigeration from the unreasonable delay or omission after such date to repair or overhaul the insulation of plaintiff’s compartments. (See 176 App. Div. 407.) Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacob Dold Packing Co. v. Kings County Refrigerating Co., 177 A.D. 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

177 A.D. 896 (Jacob Dold Packing Co. v. Kings County Refrigerating Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacob Dold Packing Co. v. Kings County Refrigerating Co.
176 A.D. 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)