Jacksonville, St. Augustine & Indian River Railway Co. v. Yelvington
43 Fla. 604
Opinion
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant takesi writ of error. The judgment is affirmed. The motion of counsel for defendant in error for the allowance of an attorney fee for defending the suit in this court is denied)
Decision Per Curiam.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacksonville, St. Augustine & Indian River Railway Co. v. Yelvington, 43 Fla. 604 (Fla. 1901).
43 Fla. 604 (Jacksonville, St. Augustine & Indian River Railway Co. v. Yelvington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.