Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Oswego Petroleum Carriers, Inc.

473 So. 2d 285, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1844, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15179
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 1985
DocketNo. BA-251
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 473 So. 2d 285 (Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Oswego Petroleum Carriers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Oswego Petroleum Carriers, Inc., 473 So. 2d 285, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1844, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15179 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

THOMPSON, Judge.

Jacksonville Shipyards appeals a final judgment entered by the trial court following remand after a previous appeal. Jacksonville Shipyards Inc. v. Oswego Petroleum Carriers, Inc., 443 So.2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (“JSI I”). Appellant argues that the trial court erred upon remand in failing to assess and award the appellate attorney’s fees granted by this court in the prior appeal, and in awarding attorney’s fees and costs only for appellant’s defense of the indemnity action. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

In JSI I this court affirmed the lower court’s decision in the original action, but held that the court should have awarded attorney’s fees for the lower court proceeding. In JSI I, appellant also filed a petition for attorney’s fees in connection with that appeal. This petition was granted, and the trial court was ordered to assess the amount.

Upon remand the trial court properly determined that appellant was entitled to attorney’s fees and costs only for appellant-indemnitee’s defense of the matter indemnified against. The trial court determined that appellant was not entitled to recover attorney’s fees and costs for its prosecution of the indemnity action itself. See American and Foreign Insurance Co. v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., 401 So.2d 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Therefore, the portion of the final judgment assessing and awarding attorney’s fees and costs for the lower court proceedings is affirmed.

The trial court neglected, however, to assess the amount of appellate attorney’s fees as ordered by this court pursuant to appellant’s motion in JSI I. This was error. It should also be noted that appellant has filed another motion for attorney’s fees in conjunction with this appeal. As in JSI I, the motion is granted and the case is remanded to the trial court to assess the amount of the fee. Both the prior appeal and this appeal involved attorney’s fees due for the defense of the indemnity action.

Accordingly, the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs for appellant’s defense of the indemnity action only, and not for prosecution of the indemnity action, is affirmed. Because of the trial court’s failure to properly assess the amount of appellate attorney’s fees ordered in JSI I the case is remanded. Upon remand the [287]*287trial court shall have two attorney’s fee amount determinations before it: it must assess the amount of attorney’s fees due appellant in connection with the appeal in JSI I, and it must assess the amount of attorney’s fees in connection with this appeal.1

Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.

MILLS and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Associated Elec. & Gas Ins. Servs., Ltd. v. Ranger Ins. Co.
560 So. 2d 242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Fitzgerald & Co., Inc. v. ROBERTS ELEC. CONT., INC.
533 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 So. 2d 285, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1844, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacksonville-shipyards-inc-v-oswego-petroleum-carriers-inc-fladistctapp-1985.