Jacksonville Coach Co.v. Dupree

82 So. 2d 745
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 12, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upo-n the motion of appellees to affirm the order appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court, 30 F.S.A., and it appearing’to the Court from an examination of the record that said petition is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further- argument;

[746]*746It is accordingly ordered, adj-udged and decreed that the motion to affirm the order appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the order is

Affirmed.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and HOBSON, THORNAL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacksonville Coach Co.v. Dupree, 82 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1955).

82 So. 2d 745 (Jacksonville Coach Co.v. Dupree) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carmazi v. Board of County Com'rs of Dade County
108 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)