Jackson-Young v. State
This text of 183 So. 3d 1264 (Jackson-Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. See Gilbert v. Singletary, 632 So.2d 1104, 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (“Habeas corpus is a collateral remedy, and is no substitute for a direct appeal.”). If petitioner wishes to raise any argument in her direct appeal in case number 1D15-2095, she must file a pro se brief in that case. By order issuing in that case simultaneously with this opinion, petitioner is given an extension of time to do so. To the extent the petition raises claims unrelated to petitioner’s direct appeal, this disposition is without prejudice to petitioner raising these claims in the circuit court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 So. 3d 1264, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1075, 2016 WL 339998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-young-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.