Jackson, Walter Louis Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 3, 2016
DocketPD-0605-16
StatusPublished

This text of Jackson, Walter Louis Jr. (Jackson, Walter Louis Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson, Walter Louis Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PD-0605&0606&0607&0608-16

NO. 14-15-00244-CR NO. 14-1 5-00245-CR ~~n' OFQr^' vt=U //\/ NO. 14-15-00246-CR ^LAPr NO. 14-15-00247-CR ^(.g FILED IN in the A^y5i COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS court of criminal appeals {'\\QolZ\2 WALTER LOUIS JACKSON, JR. •*""' Appellant

Abel Acosta, Clerk THE STATE OF v• TEXAS Abe,A^olerk Appellee

APPEAL'. FROM^ THE 26Bth DISTRICT COURT OF FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS TRIAL COURT CAUSE NUMBERS 12-DCR-062008 ; 12-DCR-062010; 12-DCR-062011; 12-DCR-062012

APPELLANT'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE P.D.R

WALTER- LOUIS JACKSON, JR TDCJ-ID* 1982B26 BETO UNIT 1391 FM 332B TENN COLONY TX 75BBO Ifol T;T:.HE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WALTER LOUIS JACKSON, JR, Appellant v .

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

:-TD THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant, moves for an extension

of SIXTY (60) days in which to file a P.D.R. pursuant to TEX.

R. APP. P. 10..5(b) and shousi

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), Appellant, moves

this Court to allow an extension of SIXTY (60) days to file

his brief. Appellants convictions were affirmed by the

Fourteenth Court of Appeals on May 5th, 2016 and pursuant to

TEX. R. APP. P. 6B. Appellant is preparing his petition for

discretionary review II. REQUIRED INFORMATION PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

The deadline for filing the extension. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5 (b) (1 )(A) : June 5, 2016. TEX. R. APP. P. 3B.6(D):"A motion to extend the time to file a brief may be filed before or after the date the brief is due."

The length of the extension sought. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b) (1 )(B) : Sixty (60) days.

The facts relied upon to reasonably explain the need for the extension. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(B): Appellant has no experience in pro se litigation and is working with jailhouse lawyers to get some assistance in this matter. Additionally, Appellant is attending the Beto Unit law library to hopefully prepare a congent P.D.R. in this matter. The sixty (60) days extension should be adequate to complete the P.D.R.

Number of previous extensions granted for previous Motions for Extension. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(D): NONE

III.

The additional time requested is not sought solely for delay

nor sought frivolously, but will be of genuine assistance to

Appellant's preparing petition for discretionary review. WHEREFORE, Appellant prays that the Court grant this

Motion and modify and extend the deadliine for filing

Appellant's petition for discretionary review to July 27, 2016,

or that this Court grant such additional time as is just and_

proper.

Respectfully submitted,

Walter Louis Jackson, Jr TDCJ ID# 19B2B26 Beto Unit 1391 FM 332B Tennessee Colony, TX 75B80

CERTIFICATE£OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing motion for Appellant has this day been sent by U.S. Postal Services to State's Attorney for Appellant on

Walter Louis Jackson, Jr WALTER LOUIS JACKSON, JR, Appellant IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, AUSTIN

ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS NO. 14-15-00244-CR; NO. 14-15-00245-CR; NO. 14-15-00246-CR

ON APPEAL FROM. THE 26BTH DISTRICT COURT, FORT BEND COUNTY, TTX Trialicourt case nos. 12-DCR-06200B; 12-DCR-062010; 12-DCR-062011; and, 12-DCR-062012

Appellant's pro se Motion to Suspend Rule 9.3(b). TEX.RiAPP. P.

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT:

COMES NOW Walter Louis Jackson, Jr, and moves the Court to

grant this, his Motion to Suspend Rule 9.3(b). TEX.R.APP.P. and

allow Appellant to file onev(T) copy of his P.D.R. Fort,the

fallowing reasons:

Appellant was declared indigent and appointed counsel

on direct appeal, Appellant remains indigent and cannot afford

paper,pens aand postage to file multiple copies and addition

does not have access to copy machines confined in TDCJ-ID.

WHEREFORE, Appellant prays this Court grant this Motion

and suspend Rule 9.3(b). TEX.R. APP.P.

Walter Louis Jackson, Jr. %o$M\ fo&u^ ijathoof)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackson, Walter Louis Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-walter-louis-jr-texapp-2016.