Jackson v. Zito
This text of 320 So. 2d 551 (Jackson v. Zito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Russell L. JACKSON
v.
James ZITO.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ refused. Since the case has been remanded, the judgment is not final.
SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted for the reasons that the question is of widespread interest and because, in my view, the judgment of the Court of Appeal to the effect that prescription of ten years is applicable to this malpractice suit is erroneous.
CALOGERO, J., would grant this writ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 So. 2d 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-zito-la-1975.