Jackson v. Young
435 S.W.2d 801, 245 Ark. 965, 1969 Ark. LEXIS 1386
Opinion
This appeal by Appellant F. H. Jackson is dismissed for failure to comply with our rule 9 (d). The only portion of the record here abstracted is the testimony of Dave Davenport and from this alone we are unable to know how the trial court-committed error in refusing a continuance or why the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. Young, 435 S.W.2d 801, 245 Ark. 965, 1969 Ark. LEXIS 1386 (Ark. 1969).
435 S.W.2d 801 (Jackson v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.