Jackson v. Wiley

Fourth Circuit

Jackson v. Wiley

103 F. App'x 505

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 22, 2004·No. No. 04-6325·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Donald Cornelius Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jackson v. Wiley, No. CA-02-652-2 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 11, 2004, entered Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Donald Cornelius Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jackson v. Wiley, No. CA-02-652-2 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 11, 2004, entered Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Jackson v. Wiley, 103 F. App'x 505 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

103 F. App'x 505 (Jackson v. Wiley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related