Jackson v. White
This text of 13 F. Cas. 258 (Jackson v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prom my own observation, I can truly state that, I have too often seen advantages attempted under colour of such receipts. I am warranted both by [259]*259common law authorities, and chancery decisions, relative to instruments of much greater solemnity, to say, that although such receipts are in general respectable evidence, yet they are by no means conclusive. Fraud, duress, misconception, mistake, in either party, are open to enquiry. If in the settlement of the account any' such ingredients appear, or any improper practices, in obtaining the receipt are discovered, the whole matter is enquirable into, and justice must he done, notwithstanding’ any prima facie evidence, arising on the face of such receipts, tending to foreclose investigation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 F. Cas. 258, 1 Pet. Adm. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-white-pennsylvaniad-1806.