Jackson v. White

13 F. Cas. 258, 1 Pet. Adm. 179
CourtDistrict Court, D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1806
DocketCase No. 7,151
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 F. Cas. 258 (Jackson v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. White, 13 F. Cas. 258, 1 Pet. Adm. 179 (pennsylvaniad 1806).

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

Prom my own observation, I can truly state that, I have too often seen advantages attempted under colour of such receipts. I am warranted both by [259]*259common law authorities, and chancery decisions, relative to instruments of much greater solemnity, to say, that although such receipts are in general respectable evidence, yet they are by no means conclusive. Fraud, duress, misconception, mistake, in either party, are open to enquiry. If in the settlement of the account any' such ingredients appear, or any improper practices, in obtaining the receipt are discovered, the whole matter is enquirable into, and justice must he done, notwithstanding’ any prima facie evidence, arising on the face of such receipts, tending to foreclose investigation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. Lucas
264 F. 938 (Ninth Circuit, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 F. Cas. 258, 1 Pet. Adm. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-white-pennsylvaniad-1806.