Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corp.
267 A.D. 890, 47 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5355
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 1944·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents in the following memorandum: This was not a sale on credit but a sale of credit. The consideration charged for the credit extended was excessive under sections 352, 357 and 358 of the Banking Law, and therefore the conditional sales agreement was void. Accordingly, I dissent and vote to reverse and grant judgment for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corp., 267 A.D. 890, 47 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
267 A.D. 890 (Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flatbush Auto Discount Corp. v. McCarthy-Bernhardt Buick, Inc.
174 N.E.2d 749 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Flatbush Auto Discount Corp. v. McCarthy-Bernhardt Buick, Inc.
9 A.D.2d 946 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Thomas v. Knickerbocker Operating Co.
202 Misc. 286 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
Benton v. Sun Industries, Inc.
277 A.D.2d 46 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)