Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corp.
This text of 267 A.D. 890 (Jackson v. Westchester Auto Credit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents in the following memorandum: This was not a sale on credit but a sale of credit. The consideration charged for the credit extended was excessive under sections 352, 357 and 358 of the Banking Law, and therefore the conditional sales agreement was void. Accordingly, I dissent and vote to reverse and grant judgment for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D. 890, 47 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-westchester-auto-credit-corp-nyappdiv-1944.