Jackson v. Wellpath Medical

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee
DecidedAugust 14, 2025
Docket2:24-cv-02773
StatusUnknown

This text of Jackson v. Wellpath Medical (Jackson v. Wellpath Medical) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Wellpath Medical, (W.D. Tenn. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

CARLOS H. JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiff, )

) Civ. No. 2:24-cv-02773-SHM-tmp v. )

) WELLPATH MEDICAL, ET AL., ) Defendants )

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(1)-(2) OR PAY THE $405 CIVIL FILING FEE, DIRECTING CLERK TO MAIL FORM, AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO ADDRESS CLAIMS AGAINST WELLPATH

On October 15, 2024, Plaintiff Carlos H. Jackson, who is incarcerated at the Shelby County Jail, filed a pro se civil complaint (ECF No. 1) and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)-(b), a prisoner bringing a civil action must pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).1 Although the obligation to pay the fee accrues at the moment the case is filed, see McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds by LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d. 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013), the PLRA provides the prisoner the opportunity to make a “down payment” of a partial filing fee and pay the remainder in installments. See Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84-85 (2016) (addressing payment of fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1));

1 The civil filing fee is $350. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The Schedule of Fees requires an additional administrative fee of $55 for filing any civil case. Local Fees | Western District of Tennessee | United States District Court (uscourts.gov) (last accessed Aug. 14, 2025). The additional fee will not apply if leave to proceed in forma pauperis is ultimately granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). However, in order to take advantage of the installment procedures, the prisoner must properly complete and submit to the district court, along with the complaint, an in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of Plaintiff’s trust account statement for the last six months immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

Although Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff did not answer Questions 3-8 on the Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (AO 240) and did not file a certified copy of Plaintiff’s trust account statement for the last six months immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit, within thirty 30 days after the date of this Order: (1) the entire $405 civil filing fee; OR

(2) a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of Plaintiff’s trust account statement for the last six months immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a copy of the prisoner in forma pauperis affidavit (AO 240) and note the date of mailing on the docket. If Plaintiff needs additional time to pay the filing fee or file the required document(s), Plaintiff may request one 30-day extension of time from this Court. McGore, 114 F.3d at 605. However, if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order in a timely manner, the Court will deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, assess the entire $405 filing fee from Plaintiff’s trust account without regard to the installment payment procedures, and dismiss the action without further notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). McGore, 114 F.3d at 605. Plaintiff is ORDERED to notify the Court immediately, in writing, of any change of address. If plaintiff fails to abide by this requirement or any other requirement of this Order, the Court may impose appropriate sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action, without any additional notice or hearing by the Court. WELLPATH Jackson named Wellpath as a defendant. (ECF No. 1 at PageID 1-2.) In consideration of

the Confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed by Wellpath Holdings, Inc. in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, see In Re Wellpath Holdings, Inc., No. 24-90533 (Bankr. S.D. Tx. May 1, 2025), ECF No. 2596; the Notice of Entry of (I) Confirmation Order, (II) Occurrence of Effective Date, and (III) Administrative Claims Bar Date, id., ECF No. 2680; and Jackson’s Complaint, it is ORDERED that: Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Jackson is DIRECTED to complete the Declaration attached to this Order and return it to the Court, OR to submit an equivalent declaration addressing: a. Whether Jackson submitted prior to April 7, 2025, a Proof of Claim to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas or to Wellpath’s Claims Agent; or

b. Whether Jackson has submitted prior to July 30, 2025, any of the following to Wellpath, its Claims Agent, or the Bankruptcy Court:

i. an objection to or motion for relief from the Automatic Stay; ii. an objection to confirmation of Wellpath’s Chapter 11 plan; and/or iii. a ballot or other communication affirmatively expressing an intent to opt out of the Third-Party Release.

Alternatively, Jackson may submit a notice of voluntary dismissal of any claims against Wellpath alleged in the instant case. See 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(2) (“A discharge in a [Chapter 11 bankruptcy] case ... operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of an action, the employment of process, or an act, to collect, recover or offset any such debt as a personal liability of the debtor, whether or not discharge of such debt is waived.”). To the extent Plaintiff seeks to pursue a claim against Wellpath, he must do so in accordance with the procedures of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston

Division. See In Re Wellpath Holdings, Inc., No. 24-90533 (Bankr. S.D. Tx.). Failure to timely comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of Jackson’s claims against Wellpath for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2025.

/s/ Samuel H. Mays, Jr. SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

DECLARATION

I, CARLOS H. JACKSON, am the Plaintiff in this action, and I declare under penalty of perjury, 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that: 1. Prior to April 7, 2025, I submitted a Proof of Claim to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas or to Wellpath’s Claims Agent. YES NO ☐ ☐ 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackson v. Wellpath Medical, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-wellpath-medical-tnwd-2025.