Jackson v. Washington Monthly Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. Washington Monthly Co.

64 A.D.2d 621, 406 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 621 (Jackson v. Washington Monthly Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Washington Monthly Co., 64 A.D.2d 621, 406 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for fraud, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 13, 1977, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Our affirmance is predicated upon the consent of defendants’ counsel, made in open court, that, should plaintiff apply in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to amend his complaint in the action now pending therein, defendants would not oppose the application of plaintiff to include therein the allegations contained in the complaint in this action. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for fraud, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 13, 1977, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Our affirmance is predicated upon the consent of defendants’ counsel, made in open court, that, should plaintiff apply in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to amend his complaint in the action now pending therein, defendants would not oppose the application of plaintiff to include therein the allegations contained in the complaint in this action. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 621, 406 N.Y.S.2d 994, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-washington-monthly-co-nyappdiv-1978.