Jackson v. Vons Companies, Inc
Opinion
3 RONALD JACKSON, 4 Case No. 2:23-cv-00711-GMN-NJK Plaintiff, 5 Order Vv. 6 4 VONS COMPANIES, INC., et al., Defendants. 8 9 Pending before the Court is Defendant Von Companies Inc’s notice of intent to appear by 10] simultaneous audiovisual transmission equipment for the motion hearing on March 31, 2025. 11] Docket No. 83. Defendant cites to a Nevada Supreme Court Rule to request to appear remotely; 12|| however, that rule governs appearance by audiovisual transmission equipment before the Nevada 13] Supreme Court for civil and family court proceedings. Docket No. 83 at 1; see also Nev. Sup. Ct. 14] R. IX-B(B)(4)(5). 15 The Court expects parties who practice in this Court to understand how to practice law in federal court and to become familiar with and follow rules applicable to this Court and to do so 17|| competently. See Dela Rosa v. Scottsdale Mem. Health Sys., Inc., 136 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir. 1998) 18 Accordingly, Defendant’s notice is DENIED. Docket No. 83. 20 Dated: March 27, 2025 21 AS Nancy J. Koppe 22 United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. Vons Companies, Inc (Jackson v. Vons Companies, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.