Jackson v. Vanderspreigle's

2 U.S. 142
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1792·Published

Opinion

By the Court:—

We have no doubt at present. The meaning of the Testatrix is plain enough. If the plaintiff’s construction were right, all the rest of the will would be destroyed. In this case, moveables must be confined to things of the same nature with those before specified. Let there be a verdict for the defendant, with liberty for the plaintiff to move for a new trial, if, on consideration, he think his position tenable.

Verdict for the Defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Vanderspreigle's, 2 U.S. 142 (1792).

2 U.S. 142 (Jackson v. Vanderspreigle's) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.