Jackson v. Twentyman

27 U.S. 136, 7 L. Ed. 374, 2 Pet. 136, 1829 U.S. LEXIS 394
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 18, 1829·Published·Cited by 27 cases

Opinion

The Court were of opinion that the 11 th section of the act must be construed in connexion with and in ftonformity to the constitution of the United States. That by the latter, the judicial power was'not extended to private suits, in which an alien is a party, unless a citizen be the adverse party. .It was indispensable therefore. to aver the citizenship of the defendants, in order to show oh the record the jurisdiction of the court:

The omission , so to do was fatal, and according to the known course of the decisions of the Court, the judgment of the circuit court must be reversed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Twentyman, 27 U.S. 136, 7 L. Ed. 374, 2 Pet. 136, 1829 U.S. LEXIS 394 (1829).

27 U.S. 136 (Jackson v. Twentyman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeLagarde v. Tours VI Ltd.
Virgin Islands, 2022
Matao Yokeno v. Sawako Sekiguchi
754 F.3d 649 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Engstrom v. Hornseth
959 F. Supp. 545 (D. Puerto Rico, 1997)
Buti v. Impressa Perosa, S.R.L.
935 F. Supp. 458 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Lloyds Bank PLC v. Norkin
817 F. Supp. 414 (S.D. New York, 1993)
International Shipping Co. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc.
675 F. Supp. 146 (S.D. New York, 1987)
Rowland v. Fayed
115 F.R.D. 605 (District of Columbia, 1987)
K & H Business Consultants Ltd. v. Cheltonian, Ltd.
567 F. Supp. 420 (D. New Jersey, 1983)
Field v. Volkswagenwerk AG
626 F.2d 293 (Third Circuit, 1980)
Sadat v. Mertes
615 F.2d 1176 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
Kavourgias v. Nicholaou Co.
148 F.2d 96 (Ninth Circuit, 1945)
Sanfeliz v. Bank of Nova Scotia
74 F.2d 338 (First Circuit, 1934)
Doidge v. Cunard S. S. Co.
19 F.2d 500 (First Circuit, 1927)
Fuentes v. Suarez
8 P.R. Fed. 121 (D. Puerto Rico, 1915)
Pooley v. Luco
72 F. 561 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California, 1896)
Stuart v. Easton
156 U.S. 46 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Herndon v. . Ins. Co.
12 S.E. 241 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)