Jackson v. Taylor

150 S.E. 156, 169 Ga. 300, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 344
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 17, 1929
DocketNo. 7208
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 150 S.E. 156 (Jackson v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Taylor, 150 S.E. 156, 169 Ga. 300, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 344 (Ga. 1929).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. "A petitioner may dismiss his petition at any time, either in term or vacation, so that he does not thereby prejudice any right of the defendant. If claims by way of set off or otherwise have been set up by the answer, the dismissal of the petition shall not interfere with the defendant’s right to a hearing and trial on such claims in that proceeding.” Civil Code (1910), § 5548. The plaintiff in error, who [301]*301sought to intervene, lost no legal or equitable right because of the dismissal of the suit by the plaintiff, and lmd no right to object to the dismissal, there being no claim by way of set-off or otherwise, and no prayer for affirmative relief.

No. 7208. October 17, 1929.

2. After announcement in open court that the case had been settled, which was equivalent to a dismissal, the court did not err in refusing to allow the intervention. Kean, v. Lathrop, 58 Ga. 355, 357; Bleckley v. White, 98 Ga. 594 (25 S. E. 592).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Etheridge, Peck & Etheridge, for plaintiff in error. J. P. Brooke, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cox v. Zucker
102 S.E.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 S.E. 156, 169 Ga. 300, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-taylor-ga-1929.