Jackson v. Tastykake, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jackson v. Tastykake, Inc.

643 A.2d 61, 537 Pa. 232, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 36

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 11, 1994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 1994, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted and the order of the Superior Court is reversed. Hudak v. Georgy, 535 Pa. 152, 153, 634 A.2d 600 (1993). The matter is remanded to the Superior Court so that it can address the other issues raised by the parties in the direct appeal to that court.

Mr. Justice CASTILLE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. Mr. Justice MONTEMURO is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of Mr. Justice LARSEN, see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 1994, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted and the order of the Superior Court is reversed. Hudak v. Georgy, 535 Pa. 152, 153, 634 A.2d 600 (1993). The matter is remanded to the Superior Court so that it can address the other issues raised by the parties in the direct appeal to that court.

Mr. Justice CASTILLE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. Mr. Justice MONTEMURO is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of Mr. Justice LARSEN, see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

Jackson v. Tastykake, Inc., 643 A.2d 61, 537 Pa. 232, 1994 Pa. LEXIS 36 (Pa. 1994).

Pincite

643 A.2d 61 (Jackson v. Tastykake, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related