Jackson v. Stuldivant

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jackson v. Stuldivant

262 S.E.2d 642, 151 Ga. App. 784, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2823

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 1, 1979

DocketApplication for Discretionary Appeal No. 14

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 262 S.E.2d 642 (Jackson v. Stuldivant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Stuldivant, 262 S.E.2d 642, 151 Ga. App. 784, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

The petitioner has applied to this court for leave to appeal an order of the trial court dismissing his petition for writ of certiorari to the Civil Service Board of the City of Atlanta. The appeal is discretionary pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701.1 (a) (1).

The petitioner and the respondent are in sharp conflict over what the decision of the Civil Service Board was, and no copy of the decision has been provided to us. This makes it impossible for us to make intelligent review of the application for leave to appeal. Furthermore, the applicant has not included as an exhibit to his petition a copy of the order of the trial court dismissing the petition for writ of certiorari, as required by Code Ann. § 6-701.1 (c). For these reasons, the application must be dismissed.

Application dismissed.

McMurray, P. J., and Underwood, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

The petitioner has applied to this court for leave to appeal an order of the trial court dismissing his petition for writ of certiorari to the Civil Service Board of the City of Atlanta. The appeal is discretionary pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701.1 (a) (1).

The petitioner and the respondent are in sharp conflict over what the decision of the Civil Service Board was, and no copy of the decision has been provided to us. This makes it impossible for us to make intelligent review of the application for leave to appeal. Furthermore, the applicant has not included as an exhibit to his petition a copy of the order of the trial court dismissing the petition for writ of certiorari, as required by Code Ann. § 6-701.1 (c). For these reasons, the application must be dismissed.

Application dismissed.

McMurray, P. J., and Underwood, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 S.E.2d 642, 151 Ga. App. 784, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-stuldivant-gactapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack