Jackson v. Stiles
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 414, 2 Cai. Cas. 368
This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 414 (Jackson v. Stiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson v. Stiles, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 414, 2 Cai. Cas. 368 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
Opinion
IT was ruled, that if a person be admitted to defend on payment of costs, and, after entering into the consent-rule, keep out of the way to avoid being served with a copy of the ca. sa. against the casual ejector, a rule will be granted to show cause, why an attachment should not go,against him; and that service of that rule, at the defendant’s house, shall be sufficient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rose v. Brown
186 Misc. 553 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 414, 2 Cai. Cas. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-stiles-nysupct-1805.