Jackson v. State

422 S.W.2d 448, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 864
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 3, 1968
DocketNo. 40788
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 422 S.W.2d 448 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. State, 422 S.W.2d 448, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 864 (Tex. 1968).

Opinion

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

This is an appeal by Horace G. Cook and Kathryn B. Cook as sureties upon the bail bond of Joe Curtis Jackson from a final judgment of the County Court of Brazoria County upon a forfeiture of said bond. The judgment final was rendered and entered on July 26, 1967.

Judgment nisi was entered May 15, 1967. Such a judgment on a bail bond is interlocutory and conditional. Said judgment provided that it would be made final unless good cause be shown why the appellant did not appear.

It is evident from the record that upon the hearing of the judgment final, the instanter bail bond in the sum of $300 and the judgment nisi marked Exhibit B which are included in the transcript; were introduced in evidence. They appear to be regular and valid and sufficiently establish the state’s case.

In answer to the judgment nisi, the sureties sought to prove that their principal had been charged and arrested for another criminal offense and was confined [449]*449continuously in jail on such charges from May IS, until after July 27, 1967; and that such confinement prevented the appearance of the principal in court and exonerates them.

To show such confinement of the principal in jail, the appellants attached to their brief filed in this court on October 20, 1967, an affidavit to that effect signed by an employee of the sheriff’s office in Harris County. There is no probative evidence which can be considered in support of appellants’ position.

In the absence of proof showing that the principal was confined in jail at the time the judgment nisi was entered, appellants’ contention cannot be sustained.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michael Anderson v. Thomas Snoddy
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
International Fidelity Insurance Company v. State
71 S.W.3d 894 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
State v. Sellers
766 S.W.2d 312 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Hokr v. State
545 S.W.2d 463 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 S.W.2d 448, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-texcrimapp-1968.