Jackson v. State

379 S.W.2d 896, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1014
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 27, 1964·No. 36807·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the possession of whiskey, wine and vodka for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, 90 days in jail.

No statement of facts accompanies the record. From the transcript it appears that appellant plead guilty on January 20, and that motion for new trial was overruled on January 21, “without the Defendant being present thereat, but being represented by his attorney.” It is only in those cases where the defendant desires to be present at the hearing of a motion for new trial and is denied such right that a reversal is called for, as will be seen by our opinion in Johnson v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 101, 289 S.W.2d 249, in which we discuss Henderson v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 18, 127 S.W.2d 902, upon which appellant relies.

We find no factual support in the record of the other contentions advanced in appellant’s brief.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 379 S.W.2d 896, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1014 (Tex. 1964).

379 S.W.2d 896 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeffery Martinez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016
Eric Christopher Gonzalez A/K/A Eric Christobal Gonzalez v. State
510 S.W.3d 10 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014)
Brian Robert Kotara v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009
Coons v. State
758 S.W.2d 330 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Escarcega v. State
711 S.W.2d 400 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)