Jackson v. State

235 S.W.2d 177, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2279

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 157 Tex. Crim. 323 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 3, 1951·No. No. 25067·Published

Opinion

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted 'for the offense of felony theft and the jury, by their verdict, assessed his punishment at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception and no statement of facts.

The sentence erroneously states that the defendant shall be confined in the penitentiary for a term of five years. It is accordingly ordered that the sentence shall be reformed so as to conform to the verdict of the jury.

The judgment, as reformed, is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODLEY, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted 'for the offense of felony theft and the jury, by their verdict, assessed his punishment at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception and no statement of facts.

The judgment, as reformed, is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Jackson v. State, 235 S.W.2d 177, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2279 (Tex. 1951).

Pincite

235 S.W.2d 177 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.