Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jackson v. State

36 S.W.3d 451, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 179, 2001 WL 69468

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2384 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 2001·No. No. ED 77853·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Malcolm Jackson appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following his conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree. Mr. Jackson contends the motion court erred by denying his Rule 29.15 motion, because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to subpoena and call a certain alibi witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Malcolm Jackson appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following his conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree. Mr. Jackson contends the motion court erred by denying his Rule 29.15 motion, because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to subpoena and call a certain alibi witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Jackson v. State, 36 S.W.3d 451, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 179, 2001 WL 69468 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

36 S.W.3d 451 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.