Jackson v. State
851 S.W.2d 532, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 1993 WL 3566
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears.
A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have prepared a written memorandum for the use of the parties in this case only.
Affirmed per Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. State, 851 S.W.2d 532, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 1993 WL 3566 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
851 S.W.2d 532 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.