Jackson v. State

851 S.W.2d 532, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 1993 WL 3566
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 12, 1993
DocketNo. 61917
StatusPublished

This text of 851 S.W.2d 532 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. State, 851 S.W.2d 532, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 1993 WL 3566 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears.

A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have prepared a written memorandum for the use of the parties in this case only.

Affirmed per Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
851 S.W.2d 532, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 32, 1993 WL 3566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-moctapp-1993.