Jackson v. State

789 S.W.2d 98, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 443, 1990 WL 29822
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4111
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 1990·No. No. 56629·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to Rule 27.26 (now repealed) to vacate sentence. No evidentiary hearing was held. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 789 S.W.2d 98, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 443, 1990 WL 29822 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

789 S.W.2d 98 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.