Jackson v. State
63 So. 269, 105 Miss. 782
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
It is probable that this court, sitting as a jury) would have acquitted the defendant upon the evidence; hut, as the jury are the sole judges of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses, we are not authorized to disturb the verdict of the jury, where there was evidence, if believed, that justified.the verdict.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. State, 63 So. 269, 105 Miss. 782 (Mich. 1913).
63 So. 269 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. State
24 So. 2d 737 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1946)
Evans v. State
132 So. 563 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Steward v. State
123 So. 891 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)