Jackson v. State
This text of 207 A.2d 509 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On this appeal the appellant contends that the evidence presented was insufficient to support his convictions in a non-jury trial on separate charges of robbery with a deadly weapon and of assault, and that his two consecutive sentences of seven and one-half years each were excessive.
We have reviewed the evidence and find that it was ample to warrant the convictions. The sentences were within the limits permitted by law and thus are not reviewable by us.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 A.2d 509, 237 Md. 652, 1965 Md. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-md-1965.