Jackson v. State
This text of 4 Ind. 560 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Information charging the defendant with, having lost, upon a game at cards, the sum of 25 cents to one John Bigler.
On the trial Jackson offered to prove, by one of the state’s witnesses, that the betting was a joint one by him[561]*561self and one Brown, and that whatever was lost was lost by them jointly. The Coart excluded the evidence.
This was erroneous. A charge that Jackson alone lost, &c., was not supported by proof that Jackson, with another, jointly lost, &c. A judgment would be no bar to another prosecution against them jointly for the same act.
The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ind. 560, 1853 Ind. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-ind-1853.