Jackson v. State
This text of 91 S.E. 923 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was direct evidence that the defendant sold whisky, as charged in the indictment, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
2. The argument of counsel for the State, excepted to in this case, was a legitimate inference from the facts proved.
3. If a trial court can make plainer the meaning of the words “reasonable doubt,” the request to give in charge “a full and complete explanation of the law of reasonable doubt, and the duty of the jury thereon,” does not illustrate the possibility, and amounts to no request.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 923, 19 Ga. App. 621, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-gactapp-1917.