Jackson v. State
78 S.E. 53, 12 Ga. App. 693, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 710
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Ga. App. 147 →
Opinion
The uncontroverted evidence showing that the accused was a minor, and that his failure to perform the services stipulated in his contract was due to the fact that his father, who under the law was entitled to his services, had hired him for the same period to another person, his conviction of a violation of the “labor contract law” of 1903 (Penal Code, § 715) was unauthorized. Harwell v. State, 2 Ga. App. 613 (58 S. E. 1111); Howard v. State, 126 Ga. 538 (55 S. E. 239).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. State, 78 S.E. 53, 12 Ga. App. 693, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 710 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).
78 S.E. 53 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Howard v. State
55 S.E. 239 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Harwell v. State
58 S.E. 1111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)