Jackson v. State
25 S.E. 177, 99 Ga. 209
Opinion
Where one indicted for a crime entered a plea of guilty, was duly sentenced, and afterwards moved to set the judgment aside on 'the ground 'that he had been induced to enter the plea by the false and fraudulent representations of two other persons “that they would see thait 'he got off with a light fine or sentence,” supporting the motion by his own affidavit only, and all of its material allegations were denied under oath by the other two persons, this court will not reverse a refusal to set the judgment aside. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. State, 25 S.E. 177, 99 Ga. 209 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 177 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jamison v. State
238 S.E.2d 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
McCrary v. the State
114 S.E.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1960)
Strickland v. State
35 S.E.2d 463 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Smith v. State
108 S.E. 121 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Foster v. State
95 S.E. 529 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Griffin v. State
77 S.E. 1080 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)